The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM has a length of 200mm, but you also need to add on the 25mm for the Sigma MC-11 adapter. This brings the total length to 225mm. The Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di

The Canon 70-200 f4 is lens offers image stabilization while the non-is lens does not. This feature allows for better handheld shooting and sharper images. The Canon 70-200mm lens series is known for its excellent zoom range and sharpness. The decision between the is and non-is version comes down to your shooting style and needs. The Canon RF 70-200 F4L IS USM is a standard telephoto zoom for the company's full-frame mirrorless system. The lens is compact given its spec: it's 119mm (4.7") long and weighs in at 695g (1.5lbs). It features 16 elements, four of which are UD glass, and dual Nano USM focus motors. The lens's built-in image stabilizer reduces shake by up to 5 The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 Sport will be available in Canon EF mount in just a few days, with the Nikon F mount shipping shortly after. You can pre-order your lens here . The f/2.8 lens shows a bit of softness at f/2.8, which improves upon stopping down, until it is sharp at f/8. The f/4 version, however, is fairly soft at all aperture settings, with mild improvement at f/8. Even if you don't care about hitting f/2.8, the Sigma and Tamron f/2.8 lenses are simply better (though only slightly) than the Canon f/4s; for the people who are looking at the Canon f/4 as a way to save money, the Tamron 70-210 saves you even more for the same performance with a better warranty.

With that said, I have zero interest in buying the 70-200 f4 or for that matter the Sony 70-200 f2.8. The new Tamron really does look interesting and I would love to try it out. Especially in the Grand Canyon or Watson Lake here in the Prescott area. Dustin Abbott gave a positive general overview on this Tamron.

La eterna lucha entre el F4 y el F2.8 esos 1300€ de diferencia entre uno y otro ¿Valen la pena? Vamos a verlo en este vídeo, con resultados reales, y tamb
I've used both, the RF 70-200 f4 is remarkably better as far as image quality. Used you should be able to get one used for $1400-1500. You can get the EF 70-200 2.8 L ii for around the same price with an adapter but it's substantially larger and heavier for just a little more bokeh/lower ISO. IMO the RF 70-200 f4 is the way to go.
Includes lens hood. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM. It comes with a lens hood so that you don’t have to buy it separately. These are used to block strong light sources, such as the sun, from the lens to prevent glare and lens flare. Lens hood is reversible.
70-200mm F4 zoom lenses may not get as much attention as their faster F2.8 siblings, but for many photographers these lenses hit the perfect sweet spot of price, performance, and weight. This week, we shoot the new Tamron 70-210mm F4 alongside the equivalent Canon and Nikon models to see how they stack up. In this chapter I’ll compare Tamron’s new lens with the other stabilized 70-200/4.0 zooms from Nikon and Canon. Plus Tamron’s larger sibling, the SP AF 70-200/2.8 Di VC USD G2 (the “f2.8 Tamron” for short). Size (diam. x length): 76 x 174mm (3.0 x 6.9in) plus another 65mm (2.6in) for the lens hood which has a diameter of 85mm. A practical comparison of the features of the f/4 and f/2.8 versions of the Canon 70-200mm IS lens. I discuss the feature differences that have an impact on Switched from Canon 5D series to Sony a7 series but kept my Canon 70-200 f/4 IS. Even with a Metabones IV adapter, I got a lot of out-of-focus shots of a rapidly moving small child. Sold the Canon and bought the Sony f/4 70-200 and eliminated the problem. I can't say which lens is shaper -- it's hard to compare zooms. TvNr9s.
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/220
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/361
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/333
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/4
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/219
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/25
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/124
  • wr2oxt6y86.pages.dev/66

    • canon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8